◈

Survey by @relationshiptracker967

3 plotted

The status journal 502

79°S 019°E

How to Understand HOLD Decisions in MCP for Wikidata

Anyone who has spent time linking records to Wikidata learns the same lesson sooner or later: uncertainty is not a bug. It is the work. The hard part is rarely finding a candidate. The hard part is deciding whether the candidate is specific enough, evidenced enough, and distinct enough to deserve a QID on the record in front of you. That is why the HOLD outcome matters in MCP for Wikidata, especially in the open source project commonly described as the Wikidata + Goog

Read How to Understand HOLD Decisions in MCP for Wikidata
64°N 038°W

How Bounded Search Shapes MCP for Google Knowledge Graph and Wikidata

The most interesting design choice in the current wave of knowledge-focused MCP tooling is not glamorous. It is not the transport layer, the prompt wrapper, or the marketing phrase attached to agent workflows. It is restraint. The open source project often described as MCP for Google Knowledge Graph and Wikidata takes that restraint seriously. Instead of dumping a broad result set into an LLM context and hoping the model sorts it out, it narrows the search space on purpo

Read How Bounded Search Shapes MCP for Google Knowledge Graph and Wikidata
76°N 009°W

Understanding Qualifiers in MCP for Wikidata Fact Retrieval

When people first work with Wikidata through an MCP server, they often focus on the headline fields: name, description, identifier, maybe a date or two. That gets you through a demo, but it does not get you very far in real retrieval work. The hard part usually starts when a fact is technically correct and still incomplete. A person held an office, but when exactly. A work has a title, but in which language. An organization has a location, but during what period. That is wh

Read Understanding Qualifiers in MCP for Wikidata Fact Retrieval